Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
documentation:standard_operators:coulomb_repulsion [2017/02/27 13:30] Maurits W. Haverkortdocumentation:standard_operators:coulomb_repulsion [2017/05/23 16:43] (current) Maurits W. Haverkort
Line 44: Line 44:
 The radial part of the operator ($\frac{\mathrm{Min}[r_i,r_j]^k}{\mathrm{Max}[r_i,r_j]^{k+1}}$) is more difficult and will be cast into parameters: The radial part of the operator ($\frac{\mathrm{Min}[r_i,r_j]^k}{\mathrm{Max}[r_i,r_j]^{k+1}}$) is more difficult and will be cast into parameters:
 \begin{equation} \begin{equation}
-R^{(k)}[\tau_1\tau_2\tau_3\tau_4]=e^2\int_0^{\infty}\int_0^{\infty}\frac{\mathrm{Min}[r_i,r_j]^k}{\mathrm{Max}[r_i,r_j]^{k+1}}R_1[r_i]R_2[r_j]R_3[r_i]R_4[r_j]\mathrm{d}r_i\mathrm{d}r_j.+R^{(k)}[\tau_1\tau_2\tau_3\tau_4]=e^2\int_0^{\infty}\int_0^{\infty}\frac{\mathrm{Min}[r_i,r_j]^k}{\mathrm{Max}[r_i,r_j]^{k+1}}R_1[r_i]R_2[r_j]R_3[r_i]R_4[r_j]r_i^2 r_j^2\mathrm{d}r_i\mathrm{d}r_j.
 \end{equation} \end{equation}
  
Line 88: Line 88:
  
 ### ###
-{{:documentation:standard_operators:coulomb_diagram_ll.png?nolink&400 |}}The Coulomb repulsion between two shells which does not change the number of electrons is given by a direct term ($l_1=l_3$ and $l_2=l_4$) and an indirect or exchange term ($l_1=l_4$ and $l_2=l_3$). The direct term is given by the Slater integrals:+{{:documentation:standard_operators:coulomb_diagram_ll.png?nolink&400 |}}The Coulomb repulsion between two shells which does not change the number of electrons is given by a direct term ($n_1l_1=n_3l_3$ and $n_2l_2=n_4l_4$) and an indirect or exchange term ($n_1l_1=n_4l_4$ and $n_2l_2=n_3l_3$). We here assume that $n_1l_1\neq n_2l_2$. The direct term is given by the Slater integrals:
 \begin{equation} \begin{equation}
 F^{(k)}=e^2\int_0^{\infty}\int_0^{\infty}\frac{\mathrm{Min}[r_i,r_j]^k}{\mathrm{Max}[r_i,r_j]^{k+1}}R_1[r_i]^2R_2[r_j]^2\mathrm{d}r_i\mathrm{d}r_j, F^{(k)}=e^2\int_0^{\infty}\int_0^{\infty}\frac{\mathrm{Min}[r_i,r_j]^k}{\mathrm{Max}[r_i,r_j]^{k+1}}R_1[r_i]^2R_2[r_j]^2\mathrm{d}r_i\mathrm{d}r_j,
Line 138: Line 138:
  
 ### ###
-Note that in the general case you need to sum over all possible permutations of $n_1l_1$, $n_2l_2$, $n_3l_3$ and $n_4l_4$. Permuting $n_1l_1$ with $n_2l_2$ and at the same time $n_3l_3$ with $n_4l_4$ will not change the value and if $n_1l_1$ is different from $n_2l_2$ and $n_3l_3$ is different from $n_4l_4$ one can add a factor of two. If one of them is the same a permutation will not lead to a new configuration and the factor of two disappears. If you just sum over all possible $n_il_i$ combinations things go right automatically. +Note that in the general case you need to sum over all possible permutations of $n_1l_1$, $n_2l_2$, $n_3l_3$ and $n_4l_4$. Permuting $n_1l_1$ with $n_2l_2$ and at the same time $n_3l_3$ with $n_4l_4$ will not change the value and form of the operator. If $n_1l_1$ is different from $n_2l_2$ and $n_3l_3$ is different from $n_4l_4$ one can add a factor of two in front of the operator and only add one of the permutations. If one of the $n_1l_1$ is the same as $n_2l_2$ or $n_3l_3$ is the same as $n_4l_4$ a permutation will not lead to a new configuration and the factor of two disappears. If you just sum over all possible $n_il_i$ combinations things go right automatically. 
 ### ###
  
 ===== Table of contents ===== ===== Table of contents =====
 {{indexmenu>.#1|msort nsort}} {{indexmenu>.#1|msort nsort}}
Print/export